My Interview with Justice Maura Corrigan

-
I noticed that the Court of Appeals has issued two published opinions this week dealing with criminal law, but before I post those to our blog, I wanted to alert everyone to a new feature we will be offering to our readers.

Today, I am launching a new podcast called "Assistance of Counsel." By following the link here and to the right, you will be able to listen to an exclusive interview I recently had with Supreme Court Justice Maura Corrigan. Justice Corrigan was gracious enough to sit down with me and discuss various topics dealing with her career, her personal life, the day-to-day operations of the Michigan Supreme Court and the history of the court. Justice Corrigan has been on the Supreme Court since 1999, and the interview is very informative for anyone interested in the inner workings of the Court and Justice Corrigan in particular.

Our new podcast offering will be an added feature linked to our blog and to our website, www.floodlaw.com. Soon, as well, our podcasts will be available on iTunes so that they will be fully downloadable to your iPod or iPhone and completely mobile. You will be able to listen to our interviews of interesting guests who will share their insights and provide information for and about lawyers and the law in general. I hope you enjoy this added feature and please feel free to leave comments and suggestions so that we can improve the site and offer interviews with guests that you would like to hear from.

Comments

  1. The Law BloggerApril 11, 2010 at 2:48 PM

    Paul, congrats on the launching of your "Assistance of Counsel" podcast series. If your contributions are anything like your blog, it will be an outstanding tool; your maiden podcast was outstanding. I had the distinct professional pleasure of working with Justice Corrigan while an associate at Plunkett & Cooney.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Violation of Sixth Amendment Wrong, but Harmlessly So

-
Image
Have you ever had the situation arise where the prosecution cannot produce the toxicologist who performed the analysis of the drugs in your trial, and, instead, will produce another member of the lab to testify that they have reviewed the work of the analyst and they conclude that the controlled substance is what the report says it is? Turns out such a scenario violates the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation of witnesses. In the case of People v Dendel , decided on August 24, 2010, Court of Appeals’ Judges Borrello and Saad, with Judge Wilder concurring, held that when the CEO of an independent laboratory (AIT Laboratories) testifies to facts in a report from another analyst at his lab, such testimony violates the confrontation clause and the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts , decided last year. Katherine Dendel was convicted following a bench trial before the Honorable Chad Schmucker in the Jackson County Circuit Court. The pros
Read more

COA to Cox: "You're fired!"

-
Image
Last week, the Michigan Court of Appeals published its opinion in the Attorney General's case against former Wayne County Circuit Judge Mary Waterstone, and in doing so, fired the entire Attorney General's Office and discharged them from any further responsibility for the prosecution. In the People v Mary Waterstone , presented to the Court by Paul Smith and Gerald Evelyn, the Attorney General had agreed to investigate and prosecute, if warranted, allegations that Judge Waterstone, Karen Plants and two Inkster police officers had either testified falsely or knowingly allowed perjured testimony to be presented to the jury in 2005 in the cases of the People v Alexander Aceval and Ricardo Pena.  After the Wayne County Prosecutor recused herself because of a conflict of interest, four other counties also refused the assignment. However, it turns out, the AG had a difficult conflict of interest himself.  Following his conviction, Aceval filed a Federal Sec. 1983 civil rights cas
Read more